There are circumstances where you are being insulted, accused, demoralised, underestimated etc. In some cases you are being used by your supervisor to do their jobs, to write paper for them, do their research, teach their subjects etc. being a good-hearted person and in the name of learning process then we follow the order even though sometimes it is not right for us to do that. it’s not wrong to follow but there is certain limitation for that. it’s time to rethink if it’s divert our attention and energy from our research.
what is it bully? this is the definition by university of melbourne postgraduate association (UMPA) based on the Victorian Occupational Health and Safety Act 1985:
DEFINITIONS (here)
Bullying is unwelcome or unreasonable behaviour that demeans, intimidates or humiliates people either as individuals or as a group. Bullying behaviour is often persistent and part of a pattern, but it can also occur as a single incident. It is usually carried out by an individual but can also be an aspect of group behaviour (see “mobbing” below). Some examples of bullying behaviour are:
Verbal communication
• Abusive and offensive language
• Insults
• Teasing
• Spreading rumour and innuendo
• Unreasonable criticism
• Trivialising of work and achievements
Manipulating the work environment
• Isolating people from normal work interaction
• Excessive demands
• Intentionally under-using a person’s time and skills
• Setting impossible deadlines
Psychological manipulation
• Unfairly blaming for mistakes
Setting people up for failure
• Deliberate exclusion
• Excessive supervision
• Practical jokes
• Belittling or disregarding opinions or suggestions
• Criticising in public
Context is important in understanding bullying, particularly verbal communication. There is a difference between friendly insults exchanged by long-time work colleagues and comments that are meant to be, or are taken as, demeaning. While care should be exercised, particularly if a person is reporting alleged bullying as a witness, it is better to be genuinely mistaken than to let actual bullying go unreported.
I knew few cases where phd students being demoralised, insulted and bully. this is few cases where i think is part of the bully that should not happen:
“your english is so foolish…”
“this is not Malaysian english you know…” (include with bad body language too)
“this fund is for you to go for conference not to fund your holiday”..(verbal accuse before hear the student justification)
“i know you won’t make it…” (even though the student is progressing and producing quite well)
“with this level of english…i will give you master by research only”
“this research is not up to phd level..” (the research already approved by the confirmation committee)
“i am the one who do the writing not you…” (the student paper already accepted and praise by the reviewing committee that well written. the sv is the co-author of the student paper)
“i don’t care about your family…” etc
“my dear student, i got another offer at other place. so today is my last day to meet you. i won’t be here anymore next week. mr so and so will take care of you and your research. nice working with you. i wish you good luck for your remaining phd”
i think this also some sort of bully if:
“the student progressing well according to the plan being agreed upon before, being confirmed up to the phd level, then up to the end let’s say at the 3 1/5 years where the student ready to submit and everything is completed then there you go the new idea that pop up to the supervisor’s mind. out of nowhere he suggest to add another objective, another chapter, or another experiment bla bla bla… then what option we have? to follow or not to follow?
to follow?
how about our time and scholarship? How it will affect our energy and motivation to go ahead? how about the effect to the whole research? etc
not to follow?
how the relationship will be? are you consider stubborn? are you allow to submit then? does he want to sign my submission? etc
by right
whose responsibility is to make our phd is up to phd level?
Whose responsibility to guide us to the right level of english?
Are we here to become their slave?
Are they going to say the same thing if the student is Australian?
who will help the student if there is a conflict?
will the helper is sincere and courage enough to help us?
are we have the right to refuse?
this sort of dilemma always playing around us along the journey…that’s why relationship with the supervisor is crucial. however as a student we have the right to defend ourselves. the only problem is we don’t have enough courage to confront the situation and make a solid decision. does not mean we are against our supervisors. i mean, we know and feel what is right and what is wrong from the body language, from the continuity of action, from consideration, from the gut feeling that you have, from your capability etc. it’s hard to make decision, but not doing one also a decision.
from my observation, threaten student in the name of english weakness is some kind of verbally abuse and demoralisation intention. in some cases is to make the student feel stupid, so the supervisor has the control over the student mind as his/her superior. it’s intentionally to escape in the near future if they can’t deliver the level of expectation for supervising the student up to the level expected as professional.
we are here to learn and we are willing to learn. the government pay a lot of money for them to guide us, not to insult us. average fee for phd is aud25000 (RM75000) per year. what if 3 to 4 years just for the svs to meet us once a month or once persemester. then blaming us saying that our works and sometime the student not qualify to do phd. do you know that no australian citizen will study at postgraduate level if they don’t get scholarship. they even do phd for free plus with the allowance.one master student (by research) told me that no one will do master if they don’t get the scholarship.
i am not advice the student to keep fighting your supervisor. but there are times when you should stand up and show the courage to defend what you think right in the professional manner. furthermore, we are the one that should have the expertise in that area. that’s part of the indicators to show that you are qualify to become a phd holder later. i don’t think accepting everything the supervisor ask you to do is a wise decision. refusing to do everything also not a good move either. so, think and pray for the right decision base on your capability…
phd journey is not easy, but the journey supposes to be an enjoyable learning experiences with a flourish relationship in a supportive environment. i believe we learn better in a conducive environment. if you learn better in a suffering condition then be it. we are the one who decide and responsible on our decision. it’s much easier to pull a rope up to the hill than push it. i don’t believe we need to suffer to get a phd because we have an option to make decision. even though being in the state of suffering is one way of learning, but i am not ready to choose that path. i prefer a path where i can control the outcomes and stay motivated along the way from the beginning till the end. without anyone has the authority to demoralised me all the time.
refer your uni website on bully policy, or postgrad guidelines. every uni has their own postgrad support unit in the faculty and postgrad centre. what you need is a little bit of courage to step forward to face the situation…this is for your future as well…
making a tough decision always hard but not making one is always harder…or put it like this…why not make a tough decision now rather than face a tougher situation later?
share your experience, what is the toughest decision you have made in your phd journey…
(Things don’t kill you will make you stronger)










